diff options
author | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> | 2018-01-02 14:59:21 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> | 2018-01-08 11:11:56 -0300 |
commit | 6703c9771d83ebe092b0d49cb0609a3f9d8b4ff7 (patch) | |
tree | c4eb1a15088733e29cedc7150c78235ab179575a /tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c | |
parent | 9128d3ed9de3882c83b927eb553d5d44c84505f5 (diff) | |
download | linux-6703c9771d83ebe092b0d49cb0609a3f9d8b4ff7.tar.gz linux-6703c9771d83ebe092b0d49cb0609a3f9d8b4ff7.tar.bz2 linux-6703c9771d83ebe092b0d49cb0609a3f9d8b4ff7.zip |
perf test bpf: Improve message about expected samples
When failing on one of the BPF tests we were just stating:
BPF filter result incorrect
Add some more info to help figuring out the problem:
BPF filter result incorrect, expected 56, got 0 samples
This came out while investigating this failure, first seen after
updating the kernel to the 4.15.0-rc6 tag:
[root@jouet ~]# perf test bpf
39: BPF filter :
39.1: Basic BPF filtering : FAILED!
39.2: BPF pinning : Skip
39.3: BPF prologue generation: Skip
39.4: BPF relocation checker : Skip
[root@jouet ~]#
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-403npu7daupv6b2bmxliv5pk@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions