aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>2018-01-02 14:59:21 -0300
committerArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>2018-01-08 11:11:56 -0300
commit6703c9771d83ebe092b0d49cb0609a3f9d8b4ff7 (patch)
treec4eb1a15088733e29cedc7150c78235ab179575a /tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
parent9128d3ed9de3882c83b927eb553d5d44c84505f5 (diff)
downloadlinux-6703c9771d83ebe092b0d49cb0609a3f9d8b4ff7.tar.gz
linux-6703c9771d83ebe092b0d49cb0609a3f9d8b4ff7.tar.bz2
linux-6703c9771d83ebe092b0d49cb0609a3f9d8b4ff7.zip
perf test bpf: Improve message about expected samples
When failing on one of the BPF tests we were just stating: BPF filter result incorrect Add some more info to help figuring out the problem: BPF filter result incorrect, expected 56, got 0 samples This came out while investigating this failure, first seen after updating the kernel to the 4.15.0-rc6 tag: [root@jouet ~]# perf test bpf 39: BPF filter : 39.1: Basic BPF filtering : FAILED! 39.2: BPF pinning : Skip 39.3: BPF prologue generation: Skip 39.4: BPF relocation checker : Skip [root@jouet ~]# Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-403npu7daupv6b2bmxliv5pk@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions