diff options
| author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2020-05-15 10:43:52 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2020-05-15 10:43:52 -0700 |
| commit | 3430223d393dd23734cc87177d704449cfc294a8 (patch) | |
| tree | 8a82f0640e498d463d8b059aa0dabb27e5214b13 /kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | |
| parent | 0141792f8b7300006b874dda1c35acd0abd90d9d (diff) | |
| parent | ed24a7a852b542911479383d5c80b9a2b4bb8caa (diff) | |
| download | linux-3430223d393dd23734cc87177d704449cfc294a8.tar.gz linux-3430223d393dd23734cc87177d704449cfc294a8.tar.bz2 linux-3430223d393dd23734cc87177d704449cfc294a8.zip | |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2020-05-15
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
We've added 37 non-merge commits during the last 1 day(s) which contain
a total of 67 files changed, 741 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() now allows to grow the tail as well, from Jesper.
2) bpftool can probe CONFIG_HZ, from Daniel.
3) CAP_BPF is introduced to isolate user processes that use BPF infra and
to secure BPF networking services by dropping CAP_SYS_ADMIN requirement
in certain cases, from Alexei.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/arraymap.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/arraymap.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c index 95d77770353c..1d5bb0d983b2 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) bool percpu = attr->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY; int ret, numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr); u32 elem_size, index_mask, max_entries; - bool unpriv = !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); + bool bypass_spec_v1 = bpf_bypass_spec_v1(); u64 cost, array_size, mask64; struct bpf_map_memory mem; struct bpf_array *array; @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) mask64 -= 1; index_mask = mask64; - if (unpriv) { + if (!bypass_spec_v1) { /* round up array size to nearest power of 2, * since cpu will speculate within index_mask limits */ @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *array_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); } array->index_mask = index_mask; - array->map.unpriv_array = unpriv; + array->map.bypass_spec_v1 = bypass_spec_v1; /* copy mandatory map attributes */ bpf_map_init_from_attr(&array->map, attr); @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static u32 array_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, struct bpf_insn *insn_buf) *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, map_ptr, offsetof(struct bpf_array, value)); *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, ret, index, 0); - if (map->unpriv_array) { + if (!map->bypass_spec_v1) { *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, ret, map->max_entries, 4); *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, ret, array->index_mask); } else { @@ -1053,7 +1053,7 @@ static u32 array_of_map_gen_lookup(struct bpf_map *map, *insn++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, map_ptr, offsetof(struct bpf_array, value)); *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, ret, index, 0); - if (map->unpriv_array) { + if (!map->bypass_spec_v1) { *insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGE, ret, map->max_entries, 6); *insn++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_AND, ret, array->index_mask); } else { |